Inductive micro-contrast evaluation method

ABSTRACT

A method and system for visualizing micro-contrast. At least one processor obtains a selected root image from a digital video, generates an assistive image, and blends the assistive image with the selected root image to obtain a mutated image, which configured to be displayed by a display device. The selected root image includes root pixels each associated with color values. The assistive image is generated based on a plurality of micro-contrast scores comprising a micro-contrast score calculated for each of at least a portion of the root pixels. The micro-contrast score is calculated for a selected one of the root pixels by identifying a submatrix centered at the selected root pixel, and calculating the micro-contrast score for the selected root pixel based on the color values associated with only sample pixels positioned one each at corners of the submatrix.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.62/468,063, filed on Mar. 7, 2017, and U.S. Provisional Application No.62/468,874, filed on Mar. 8, 2017, both of which are incorporated hereinby reference in their entireties.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention is directed generally to methods of quantifyingmicro-contrast and visualizing micro-contrast in images and digitalvideo.

Description of the Related Art

Within an image, contrast may be defined as a difference in luminanceand/or color that makes an object distinguishable from other features(e.g., other objects) within the image. Thus, contrast may be mostvisible at an edge or boundary between different objects. On the otherhand, micro-contrast refers to contrast between adjacent (or nearlyadjacent) pixels. Therefore, micro-contrast is not concerned with edgesor boundaries. Further, while micro-contrast differs from sharpness, animage with good micro-contrast may appear sharper.

Unfortunately, some image processing techniques (e.g., physicalanti-aliasing filters and/or software-based moire pattern reduction) canresult in relatively homogeneous adjacent pixels. In other words, thesetechniques may reduce micro-contrast within a resultant image. Thisproblem can be further exacerbated by a color filter array (“CFA”)Demosaic scheme that prioritizes high output spatial resolution overnative acutance. Overlays used to visualize focus may be derived frompixel-submatrix convolution operators (like Sobel, Roberts Cross, orPrewitt) and are commonly used to overcome the problem of near-pixelhomogeneity. Unfortunately, these approaches struggle to discriminatebetween high-frequency detail and Gaussian noise.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a video capture system.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a method of generating a mutated imageperformable by the video capture system.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a submatrix used by the video capturesystem when performing the method of FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram illustrating an exemplary mobilecommunication device that may be used to implement the video capturesystem.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 illustrates a video capture system 200 configured to capturedigital video 203, which may be referred to as an image stream. Forexample, the digital video 203 may be captured and/or processed as aReal-Time Messaging Protocol (“RTMP”) video stream. By way of anon-limiting example, the video capture system 200 may be implemented asa mobile communication device 140 (described below and illustrated inFIG. 4). The video capture system 200 includes a housing 202, a camera204, one or more processors 206, memory 208, a display 210, and one ormore manual controls 220. The camera 204, the processor(s) 206, thememory 208, and the display 210 may be connected together by a bus 212(e.g., like a bus system 186 illustrated in FIG. 4).

The camera 204 is mounted on the housing 202. The camera 204 isconfigured to capture the digital video 203 and store that digital video203 in the memory 208. The captured digital video 203 includes a seriesof root images (e.g., including a root image 240) of a scene. By way ofa non-limiting example, the camera 204 may be implemented as a camera orvideo capture device 158 (see FIG. 4).

The processor(s) 206 is/are configured to execute software instructionsstored in the memory 208. By way of a non-limiting example, theprocessor(s) 206 may be implemented as a central processing unit (“CPU”)150 (see FIG. 4) and the memory 208 may be implemented as memory 152(see FIG. 4).

The display 210 is positioned to be viewed by the user while the useroperates the video capture system 200. The display 210 is configured todisplay a preview of the digital video 203 being captured by the camera204. By way of a non-limiting example, the display 210 may beimplemented as conventional display device, such as a touch screen. Thedisplay 210 may be mounted on the housing 202. For example, the display210 may be implemented as a display 154 (see FIG. 4). Alternatively, thedisplay 210 may be implemented as an electronic viewfinder, an auxiliarymonitor connected to the video capture system 200, and the like.

The manual control(s) 220 is/are configured to be operated by the userand may affect properties (e.g., focus, exposure, and the like) of thedigital video 203 being captured. The manual control(s) 220 may beimplemented as software controls that generate virtual controlsdisplayed by the display 210. In such embodiments, the display 210 maybe implemented as touch screen configured to receive user input thatmanually manipulates the manual control(s) 220. Alternatively, themanual control(s) 220 may be implemented as physical controls (e.g.,button, knobs, and the like) disposed on the housing 202 and configuredto be manually manipulated by the user. In such embodiments, the manualcontrol(s) 220 may be connected to the processor(s) 206 and the memory208 by the bus 212.

By way of non-limiting examples, the manual control(s) 220 may include afocus control 220A, an exposure control 220B, and the like. The focuscontrol 220A may be used to change the focus of the digital video beingcaptured by the camera 204. The exposure control 220B may change an ISOvalue, shutter speed, aperture, or an exposure value (“EV”) of thedigital video being captured by the camera 204.

The memory 208 stores an Inductive Micro-Contrast Evaluation (“IMCE”)module 230 implemented by the processor(s) 206. In some embodiments, theIMCE module 230 may generate and display the virtual controlsimplementing the manual control(s) 220. Alternatively, the manualcontrol(s) 220 may be implemented by other software instructions storedin the memory 208.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of an IMCE method 280 performed by the IMCEmodule 230. Referring to FIG. 1, the IMCE method 280 (see FIG. 2) is animage analysis technique in which high frequency detail (or local areacontrast) is evaluated at a per-pixel level and represented to a uservisually in the form of a mutated image 250. The mutated image 250 is ablend of a selected one of the series of root images of the digitalvideo 203 and an assistive image or overlay 232 created from theselected root image. While the assistive overlay 232 is referred to asan overlay, the assistive overlay 232 is not actually an overlay, whichis a semi-transparent element or image displayed at the same time as andon top of an original image (e.g., the root image 240). Instead, theIMCE method 280 may generate a single mutated image 250 for eachcorresponding root image (e.g., the root image 240) within at least aportion of the digital video 203. The mutated image 250 is configured tohelp the user view micro-contrast within the corresponding root image.Each mutated image 250 is displayed by the display 210, instead of thecorresponding root image. Thus, the mutated image 250 is not the productof a multi-image composite. For ease of illustration, the IMCE method280 (see FIG. 2) will be described as generating the assistive overlay232 from the root image 240.

In first block 282 (see FIG. 2), the IMCE module 230 obtains the rootimage 240. The root image 240 is a bitmap that may be processed by agraphics processing unit (“GPU”) or CPU (e.g., the processor(s) 206).

At this point, the IMCE module 230 processes each root pixel of the rootimage 240 one at a time. Thus, in block 284 (see FIG. 2), the IMCEmodule 230 selects one of the root pixels of the root image 240 (e.g., aselected root pixel 300 illustrated in FIG. 3).

Next, in block 286 (see FIG. 2), the IMCE module 230 extracts oridentifies a submatrix 310 (see FIG. 3) from the root image 240.Referring to FIG. 3, the submatrix 310 (e.g., a two-dimensional 3×3block of pixels) includes the selected root pixel 300 at coordinate (0,0) and its surrounding neighborhood, which includes those pixels atcoordinates (−1, −1), (−1, 0), (−1, 1), (0, −1), (0, 0), (0, 1), (1,−1), (1, 0), and (1, 1) relative to the selected root pixel 300. Thus,the selected root pixel 300 at coordinate (0, 0) may be characterized asbeing an origin of the submatrix 310 (which includes the selected rootpixel 300 and its eight surrounding neighbors).

Referring to FIG. 3, in block 288 (see FIG. 2), the IMCE module 230 (seeFIG. 1) identifies or selects sample pixels SP1-SP4 from the submatrix310. The sample pixels SP1-SP4 are least likely to be influenced by theselected root pixel 300 itself. For example, the sample pixels SP1-SP4may include those pixels in the corners of the submatrix 310. Thus, thesample pixels SP1-SP4 are those pixels at coordinates (−1, −1), (−1, 1),(1, −1), and (1, 1) relative to the selected root pixel 300, which is atcoordinate (0, 0).

In block 290 (see FIG. 2), the IMCE module 230 calculates amicro-contrast score (“MCS”) representing micro-contrast. Themicro-contrast score (“MCS”) may be implemented as a scalarfloating-point value. The micro-contrast score (“MCS”) may have a valueon a scale from a minimum value (e.g., zero) to a maximum value (e.g.,one). In such embodiments, the minimum value may represent lowmicro-contrast and the maximum value may represent high micro-contrast.The following Equation 1 may be used to calculate the value of themicro-contrast score (“MCS”):

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{MCS} = \frac{\min \begin{pmatrix}{1.25,{{{length}\left( {{{pixel}\left( {{- 1},{- 1}} \right)} - {{pixel}\left( {1,1} \right)}} \right)} +}} \\{{length}\left( {{{pixel}\left( {{- 1},1} \right)} - {{pixel}\left( {1,{- 1}} \right)}} \right)}\end{pmatrix}}{1.25.}} \\{= \frac{\min \left( {1.25,{{{length}\left( {{{SP}\; 1} - {{SP}\; 2}} \right)} + {{length}\left( {{{SP}\; 3} - {{SP}\; 4}} \right)}}} \right)}{1.25}}\end{matrix} & {{Eq}.\mspace{14mu} 1}\end{matrix}$

Alternatively, the following Equation 2 may be used to calculate thevalue of the micro-contrast score (“MCS”):

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{MCS} = \frac{\begin{pmatrix}{{{length}\left( {{{pixel}\left( {{- 1},{- 1}} \right)} - {{pixel}\left( {1,1} \right)}} \right)} +} \\{{length}\left( {{{pixel}\left( {{- 1},1} \right)} - {{pixel}\left( {1,{- 1}} \right)}} \right)}\end{pmatrix}}{\left( {2*3^{0.5}} \right)}} \\{= \frac{\left( {{{length}\left( {{{SP}\; 1} - {{SP}\; 2}} \right)} + {{length}\left( {{{SP}\; 3} - {{SP}\; 4}} \right)}} \right)}{3.464}}\end{matrix} & {{Eq}.\mspace{14mu} 2}\end{matrix}$

In Equations 1 and 2 above, the sample pixels SP1 and SP2 are a firstpair of pixels along a first diagonal and the sample pixels SP3 and SP4are a second pair of pixels along a second diagonal. In Equations 1 and2, the length of a first pixel minus a second pixel (e.g.,length(SP1−SP2)) within one of the first and second pairs is determinedby subtracting the RGB color values of the second pixel from the RGBcolor values of the first pixel to obtain a resultant set of RGB colorvalues. Then, the resultant RGB color values obtained for each of thefirst and second pairs are treated as three-dimensional coordinates andeach converted into a length using the following Equation 3:

length=√{square root over (R ² +G ² +B ²)}  Eq. 3

Thus, the value of length(SP1−SP2) is calculated using the followingEquation 4:

length(SP1−SP2)=√{square root over ((R _(SP1) −R _(SP2))²+(G _(SP1) −G_(SP2))²+(B _(SP1) −B _(SP2))²)}  Eq. 4

Similarly, the value of length(SP3−SP4) is calculated using thefollowing Equation 5:

length(SP3−SP4)=√{square root over ((R _(SP3) −R _(SP4))²+(G _(SP3) −G_(SP4))²+(B _(SP3) −B _(SP4))²)}  Eq. 5

In the equations above, the RGB color values may each be scaled to rangefrom zero to one. In such embodiments, a maximum possible value of eachof the length(SP1−SP2) and the length(SP3−SP4) is the square root ofthree. A total maximum distance may be defined as twice the square rootof three (2*3^(0.5)≈3.464). Thus, the IMCE method 280 generates themicro-contrast score (“MCS”) as a sum of a first distance between afirst pair of vectors (length(SP1−SP2)) and a second distance between asecond pair of vectors (length(SP3−SP4)) divided by the total maximumdistance. Therefore, the micro-contrast score (“MCS”) may becharacterized as being of a percentage of the total maximum distance.

Next, referring to FIG. 2, in decision block 292, the IMCE module 230(see FIG. 1) determines whether all of the root pixels of the root image240 have been selected in block 284. The decision in decision block 292is “YES,” when the IMCE module 230 (see FIG. 1) has not yet selected allof the root pixels. When the decision in decision block 292 is “YES,”the IMCE module 230 (see FIG. 1) returns to block 284 and selects a nextroot pixel from the root image 240 (see FIG. 1).

On the other hand, the decision in decision block 292 is “NO,” when theIMCE module 230 (see FIG. 1) has selected all of the root pixels. Whenthe decision in decision block 292 is “NO,” the IMCE module 230 (seeFIG. 1) has calculated the micro-contrast score (“MCS”) for each of theroot pixels in the root image 240 (see FIG. 1). Referring to FIG. 1, inblock 294 (see FIG. 2), the IMCE module 230 uses the micro-contrastscores calculated for each of the root pixels to generate the assistiveoverlay 232 and display the mutated image 250. For example, as mentionedabove, each of the micro-contrast scores may have a value on the scalefrom the minimum value (e.g., zero) to the maximum value (e.g., one).These values may be mapped (e.g., linearly, using lookup table, and thelike) to color values. For example, the minimum value may be mapped to afirst overlay color (e.g., blue), the maximum value may be mapped to asecond overlay color (e.g., green), and values between the minimum andthe maximum values may be mapped to a blend of the first and secondoverlay colors. Thus, in the assistive overlay 232, low contrast areasin the first overlay color (e.g., blue) and high contrast areas may beshown in the second overlay color (e.g., green) with other levels ofcontrast interpolated (e.g., linear) between the first and secondoverlay colors. Thus, the assistive overlay 232 may include a linearblend of the first and second overlay colors (e.g., blue and green). Inthe mutated image 250, the first overlay color (e.g., blue) visualizesthe broader focal plane in the root image 240 and the second overlaycolor (green) visualizes high micro-contrast (or critical focus) in theroot image 240.

In block 296 (see FIG. 2), the IMCE module 230 creates the mutated image250 by blending the assistive overlay 232 and the root image 240 andinstructs the display 210 to display the mutated image 250 (e.g., as apreview of the root image 240).

For example, the IMCE module 230 may use a blend ratio 234 to blend theassistive overlay 232 and the root image 240 together. The blend ratio234 determines how much the assistive overlay 232 and the root image 240each contribute to the mutated image 250. The blend ratio 234 may becharacterized as including first and second weights that sum to one. Theassistive overlay 232 may be weighted by the first weight and the rootimage 240 may be weighted by the second weight. The pixels of theassistive overlay 232 are blended with the root pixels by applying thefirst weight to each of the pixels of the assistive overlay 232 and thesecond weight to each of the root pixels. Then, the weighted pixels ofthe assistive overlay 232 are added to the weighted root pixels toobtain the mutated pixels. Thus, each pixels of the assistive overlay232 may be blended with a corresponding root pixel using a per-pixellinear-mix operation.

Optionally, only those portions of the assistive overlay 232 having amicro-contrast score greater than or equal to a minimum evaluationthreshold value may be blended with the root image 240. Thus, portionsof the assistive overlay 232 having a micro-contrast score less than theminimum evaluation threshold value may be omitted from the mutated image250. For any omitted portion(s) of the assistive overlay 232, thecorresponding root pixel is used in the mutated image 250. The minimumevaluation threshold value may vary based on desired sensitivity.

The assistive overlay 232 visualizes the entire focal plane and mayappear as colored lines drawn on top of regions of the root image 240(e.g., assigned micro-contrast scores greater than or equal to theminimum evaluation threshold value). Unlike prior art colorizededge-detection overlays (often referred to as “focus peaking”), the IMCEmodule 230 does not use a single arbitrary color to visualize focus ormicro-contrast. Instead, the IMCE module 230 may paint a linear blend ofthe first and second overlay colors (which are the assistive overlay232) on the root image 240.

The assistive overlay 232 may be challenging to see if the underlyingroot image 240 is chromatically vibrant. Optionally, to make theassistive overlay 232 easier to see, the IMCE module 230 may generate aglobal desaturation of the root image 240 (or a desaturated version ofthe root image 240). Then, the IMCE module 230 creates the mutated image250 by blending the assistive overlay 232 with the desaturated versionof the root image 240.

Then, the IMCE method 280 (see FIG. 2) terminates.

Referring to FIG. 3, the IMCE method 280 (see FIG. 2) evaluatesmicro-contrast without convolving the entire neighborhood of theselected root pixel 300. By considering only the sample pixels SP1−SP4,the IMCE method 280 (see FIG. 2) effectively evaluates local areacontrast without the need to de-noise the image buffer beforeprocessing. This approach also largely negates the influence of Gaussiannoise because the thresholding can be much lower. In other words, byusing the sample pixels SP1−SP4 instead of prior art pixel-submatrixconvolution operators (like Sobel, Roberts Cross, or Prewitt), the IMCEmethod 280 (see FIG. 2) is able to discriminate between high-frequencydetail and Gaussian noise.

Referring to FIG. 1, the IMCE method 280 (see FIG. 2) is not a means ofimage enhancement and does not introduce additional micro-contrast intothe root image 240. Instead, the IMCE method 280 (see FIG. 2) is asingle-pass operation that creates a micro-contrast map (the assistiveoverlay 232) that is capable of representing unembellishedmicro-contrast levels.

The assistive overlay 232 helps the user visualizes degrees ofmicro-contrast, not focus. Therefore, the assistive overlay 232 (ormicro-contrast map) generated by the IMCE method 280 (see FIG. 2) is notintended to be used for focus acquisition.

The micro-contrast score (“MCS”) is generated on a per-pixel basis andis always subject to user-interpretation. Neither the video capturesystem 200 nor the IMCE method 280 (see FIG. 2) attempts to interpreteither the assistive overlay 232 or the micro-contrast scores for theuser. The user is free to interpret the assistive overlay 232 as beingindicative of focus, chromatic aberration, or out-of-focus apertureartifacts.

Using the assistive overlay 232, the user may adjust the manualcontrol(s) 220 (e.g., the focus control 220A) or other parameters toimprove the micro-contrast in the root image 240. For example, the usermay adjust the lighting and view the assistive overlay 232 (e.g., in apreview) using the display 210. Then, the user may view the assistiveoverlay 232 to see if the change in lighting improved the micro-contrastin the current root image 240.

Mobile Communication Device

FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram illustrating a mobile communicationdevice 140. The mobile communication device 140 may be implemented as acellular telephone, smart phone, a tablet computing device, aself-contained camera module (e.g., a wired web camera or an ActionCamera module), and the like. By way of a non-limiting example, themobile communication device 140 may be implemented as a smartphoneexecuting IOS or Android OS. The mobile communication device 140 may beconfigured to capture the digital video 203 (see FIG. 1) and process thedigital video 203 as a RTMP protocol video stream.

The mobile communication device 140 includes the CPU 150. Those skilledin the art will appreciate that the CPU 150 may be implemented as aconventional microprocessor, application specific integrated circuit(ASIC), digital signal processor (DSP), programmable gate array (PGA),or the like. The mobile communication device 140 is not limited by thespecific form of the CPU 150.

The mobile communication device 140 also contains the memory 152. Thememory 152 may store instructions and data to control operation of theCPU 150. The memory 152 may include random access memory, ready-onlymemory, programmable memory, flash memory, and the like. The mobilecommunication device 140 is not limited by any specific form of hardwareused to implement the memory 152. The memory 152 may also be integrallyformed in whole or in part with the CPU 150.

The mobile communication device 140 also includes conventionalcomponents, such as a display 154 (e.g., operable to display the mutatedimage 250), the camera or video capture device 158, and keypad orkeyboard 156. These are conventional components that operate in a knownmanner and need not be described in greater detail. Other conventionalcomponents found in wireless communication devices, such as USBinterface, Bluetooth interface, infrared device, and the like, may alsobe included in the mobile communication device 140. For the sake ofclarity, these conventional elements are not illustrated in thefunctional block diagram of FIG. 4.

The mobile communication device 140 also includes a network transmitter162 such as may be used by the mobile communication device 140 fornormal network wireless communication with a base station (not shown).FIG. 4 also illustrates a network receiver 164 that operates inconjunction with the network transmitter 162 to communicate with thebase station (not shown). In a typical embodiment, the networktransmitter 162 and network receiver 164 are implemented as a networktransceiver 166. The network transceiver 166 is connected to an antenna168. Operation of the network transceiver 166 and the antenna 168 forcommunication with a wireless network (not shown) is well-known in theart and need not be described in greater detail herein.

The mobile communication device 140 may also include a conventionalgeolocation module (not shown) operable to determine the currentlocation of the mobile communication device 140.

The various components illustrated in FIG. 4 are coupled together by thebus system 186. The bus system 186 may include an address bus, data bus,power bus, control bus, and the like. For the sake of convenience, thevarious busses in FIG. 4 are illustrated as the bus system 186.

The memory 152 may store instructions executable by the CPU 150. Theinstructions may implement portions of one or more of the methodsdescribed above (e.g., the IMCE method 280 illustrated in FIG. 2). Suchinstructions may be stored on one or more non-transitory computer orprocessor readable media.

The foregoing described embodiments depict different componentscontained within, or connected with, different other components. It isto be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary,and that in fact many other architectures can be implemented whichachieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangementof components to achieve the same functionality is effectively“associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, anytwo components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality canbe seen as “associated with” each other such that the desiredfunctionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedialcomponents. Likewise, any two components so associated can also beviewed as being “operably connected,” or “operably coupled,” to eachother to achieve the desired functionality.

While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shownand described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that,based upon the teachings herein, changes and modifications may be madewithout departing from this invention and its broader aspects and,therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope allsuch changes and modifications as are within the true spirit and scopeof this invention. Furthermore, it is to be understood that theinvention is solely defined by the appended claims. It will beunderstood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein,and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appendedclaims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term“including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” theterm “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term“includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,”etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that if aspecific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such anintent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence ofsuch recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid tounderstanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of theintroductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claimrecitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed toimply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinitearticles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing suchintroduced claim recitation to inventions containing only one suchrecitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases“one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or“an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should typically be interpreted to mean “atleast one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use ofdefinite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, evenif a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitlyrecited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitationshould typically be interpreted to mean at least the recited number(e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without othermodifiers, typically means at least two recitations, or two or morerecitations).

Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appendedclaims.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A video capture system comprising: memorystoring instructions; a camera configured to capture digital video andstore the digital video in the memory, the digital video comprising aseries of root images; and at least one processor configured to executethe instructions, when executed, the instructions causing the at leastone processor to (a) obtain a selected one of the series of root images,the selected root image comprising root pixels each associated withcolor values, (b) assign a plurality of micro-contrast scores one eachto each of the root pixels, (c) generate an assistive image based on theplurality of micro-contrast scores, and (d) blend the assistive imagewith the selected root image to obtain a mutated image, assigning theplurality of micro-contrast scores comprising: selecting each of theroot pixels one at a time as a selected root pixel, for each selectedroot pixel, identifying a submatrix centered at the selected root pixeland comprising a plurality of corners and a plurality of sample pixelspositioned one each at each of the corners, and calculating a selectedone of the plurality of micro-contrast scores for each selected rootpixel, the selected micro-contrast score being calculated based on thecolor values associated with only the plurality of sample pixels of thesubmatrix identified for the selected root pixel.
 2. The video capturesystem of claim 1, further comprising: a display, the instructionscausing the at least one processor to instruct the display to displaythe mutated image to a user.
 3. The video capture system of claim 1,wherein for each selected root pixel, the plurality of sample pixels ofthe submatrix identified for the selected root pixel comprise first,second, third, and fourth sample pixels, the first and second pixels arealong a first diagonal of the submatrix identified for the selected rootpixel, the third and fourth pixels are along a second diagonal of thesubmatrix identified for the selected root pixel, and the selectedmicro-contrast score is calculated for the selected root pixel by:subtracting the color values of the second sample pixel from the colorvalues of the first sample pixel to obtain first resultant color values,calculating a first length from the first resultant color values,subtracting the color values of the fourth sample pixel from the colorvalues of the third sample pixel to obtain second resultant colorvalues, calculating a second length from the second resultant colorvalues, adding the first and second lengths to obtain a sum, anddividing the sum by a total maximum distance value.
 4. The video capturesystem of claim 3, wherein the first resultant color values comprise afirst red value, a first green value, and a first blue value, the firstlength is calculated from the first resultant color values bycalculating a square root of a first total of the first red valuesquared, the first green value squared, and the first blue valuesquared, the second resultant color values comprise a second red value,a second green value, and a second blue value, and the second length iscalculated from the second resultant color values by calculating asquare root of a second total of the second red value squared, thesecond green value squared, and the second blue value squared.
 5. Thevideo capture system of claim 1, wherein the submatrix identified foreach selected root pixel is three of the root pixels by three of theroot pixels.
 6. The video capture system of claim 1, wherein theplurality of micro-contrast scores are numerical values on a scaleranging from a minimum value to a maximum value, and the assistive imageis generated by mapping the minimum value to a first color, the maximumvalue to a second color, and those of the numerical values between theminimum and maximum values to a blend of the first and second colors. 7.The video capture system of claim 6, wherein the blend of the first andsecond colors is a linear blend that maps those of the numerical valuesfalling between the minimum and maximum values to a linear combinationof the first and second colors determined using linear interpolation. 8.The video capture system of claim 1, wherein the instructions cause theat least one processor to desaturate the selected root image before theassistive image is blended therewith to obtain the mutated image.
 9. Thevideo capture system of claim 1, wherein generating the assistive imagebased on the plurality of micro-contrast scores comprises omitting fromthe assistive image those of the plurality of micro-contrast scores thatfail to exceed a threshold value.
 10. A method comprising: obtaining,with at least one processor, a selected root image from a digital video,the selected root image comprising root pixels each associated withcolor values; until each of the root pixels has been selected, (a)selecting, with the at least one processor, one of the root pixels, (b)identifying, with the at least one processor, a submatrix centered atthe selected root pixel and comprising a plurality of corners and aplurality of sample pixels positioned one each at each of the corners,and (c) calculating, with the at least one processor, a micro-contrastscore for the selected root pixel based on the color values associatedwith only the plurality of sample pixels; generating, with the at leastone processor, an assistive image based on a plurality of micro-contrastscores comprising the micro-contrast score calculated for each of atleast a portion of the root pixels; blending, with the at least oneprocessor, the assistive image with the selected root image to obtain amutated image; and displaying, with a display device, the mutated image.11. The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of sample pixelscomprise first, second, third, and fourth sample pixels, the first andsecond pixels are along a first diagonal of the submatrix, the third andfourth pixels are along a second diagonal of the submatrix, and themicro-contrast score is calculated for the selected root pixel by:subtracting the color values of the second sample pixel from the colorvalues of the first sample pixel to obtain first resultant color values,calculating a first length from the first resultant color values,subtracting the color values of the fourth sample pixel from the colorvalues of the third sample pixel to obtain second resultant colorvalues, calculating a second length from the second resultant colorvalues, adding the first and second lengths to obtain a sum, anddividing the sum by a total maximum distance value.
 12. The method ofclaim 11, wherein the first resultant color values comprise a first redvalue, a first green value, and a first blue value, the first length iscalculated from the first resultant color values by calculating a squareroot of a first total of the first red value squared, the first greenvalue squared, and the first blue value squared, the second resultantcolor values comprise a second red value, a second green value, and asecond blue value, and the second length is calculated from the secondresultant color values by calculating a square root of a second total ofthe second red value squared, the second green value squared, and thesecond blue value squared.
 13. The method of claim 10, wherein thesubmatrix is three of the root pixels by three of the root pixels. 14.The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of micro-contrast scoresare numerical values on a scale ranging from a minimum value to amaximum value, and the assistive image is generated by mapping theminimum value to a first color, the maximum value to a second color, andthose of the numerical values between the minimum and maximum values toa blend of the first and second colors.
 15. The method of claim 14,wherein the blend of the first and second colors is a linear blend thatmaps those of the numerical values falling between the minimum andmaximum values to a linear combination of the first and second colorsdetermined using linear interpolation.
 16. The method of claim 10,further comprising: desaturating, with the at least one processor, theselected root image before the assistive image is blended therewith toobtain the mutated image.
 17. The method of claim 10, wherein theportion of the root pixels includes only the root pixels for which themicro-contrast score calculated for the root pixel exceeds a thresholdvalue.
 18. A method comprising: until a plurality of mutated images havebeen displayed, (a) obtaining, with at least one processor, a selectedroot image from a digital video comprising a plurality of consecutiveroot images, the selected root image comprising root pixels eachassociated with color values, (b) assigning, with the at least oneprocessor, a plurality of micro-contrast scores one each to each of theroot pixels, (c) generating, with the at least one processor, anassistive image based on the plurality of micro-contrast scores, (d)blending, with the at least one processor, the assistive image with theselected root image to obtain a new one of the plurality of mutatedimages, and (e) displaying, with a display device, the new mutatedimage, wherein assigning the plurality of micro-contrast scorescomprises until each of the root pixels has been selected, (i)selecting, with the at least one processor, one of the root pixels, (ii)identifying, with the at least one processor, a submatrix centered atthe selected root pixel and comprising a plurality of corners and aplurality of sample pixels positioned one each at each of the corners,and (iii) calculating, with the at least one processor, one of theplurality of micro-contrast scores for the selected root pixel based onthe color values associated with only the plurality of sample pixels.19. The method of claim 18, further comprising: desaturating, with theat least one processor, the selected root image before the assistiveimage is blended therewith to obtain the new mutated image.